Tactical strategy and coaching is absolutely crucial to the modern trò chơi of soccer. Things have developed a lot since the early days of the sport when teams were organized in pretty basic ways, their play relying on the skill & creativity of individual players. Today, professional strategies are complex, và one of the most important aspects of any coach"s approach to a match is the formation they choose khổng lồ play.

Bạn đang xem: The 4

Recently, we"ve produced a number of formation explainer pieces, including one on the strengths và weaknesses of the 4-4-2 formation. Each system has its pros and cons, which is why today we"ll be focusing on the key aspects of another popular shape: the 4-2-3-1 formation. This is the favored structure of tons of club & international teams across the world, so having a good understanding of exactly how it works can seriously improve your ability khổng lồ analyze và observe professional matches.

How vị you play a 4-2-3-1?

Between 2008 và 2012, Spain dominated world football by finetuning the 4-2-3-1 system, pioneering the rise of this formation into the mainstream. In fact, their success with it (they won 2 European Championships & 1 World Cup during this period) led to it becoming probably the world"s most popular formation for a number of years. However, this iconic international side wasn"t the first-ever team lớn use 4-2-3-1 (although it did originate in Spain).

Juanma Lillo, a Spanish coach currently working as Pep Guardiola"s assistant at Manchester City, is credited with being the first proponent of this system. A largely unknown but nonetheless revolutionary coach, Lillo was a major early influence on Guardiola, having taken charge of his first La Liga club, Salamanca, in 1992, aged just 29. It was here that he began advocating for the 4-2-3-1 shape.

But how exactly does this formation look in practice? 4-2-3-1 is made up of a back four, 2 defensive midfielders, a more advanced midfield 3 including two wide midfielders, & a lone central striker. Often used by teams that look lớn dominate possession, the 4-2-3-1 shape is all about spreading players across the pitch in a balanced way và aiming khổng lồ control midfield areas.

Having 5 midfielders makes this possible; however, structuring them as 2 separate units allows the central defensive midfielders to concentrate on shielding the back four & progressing the ball, while the ngân hàng of 3 in front of them focuses on supporting the striker and creating chances.

This midfield 3 can also be highly fluid, switching positions with each other và getting themselves into advanced areas in order to links up with the center forward. This is crucial because otherwise, the lone striker could become isolated. Regardless, they will be relied upon khổng lồ press defenders & stop them from easily moving the ball forwards.

What are the strengths of a 4-2-3-1 formation?

One of the key reasons the 4-2-3-1 formation has gained prominence within the last 15 years or so is because of the sense of balance it provides. The combination of a back four with two central defensive midfielders gives teams a strong degree of defensive stability.

Even if full-backs decide to step forward và join attacks (like full-backs Dani Alves & Marcelo did within Brazil"s 4-2-3-1 shape), there are still two central midfielders (also referred khổng lồ as a double pivot) providing defensive cover, và two center-backs sat even deeper behind them. Pushing these two full-backs forward can also help create plenty of width in more advanced positions, as well as forcing opposition wingers khổng lồ track back and cover.

Perhaps the most crucial benefit of playing 4-2-3-1 is that it gives your team a good chance of being able khổng lồ build up và keep possession of the ball for sustained periods. If your aim is lớn use your back four lớn receive the ball from their goalkeeper and progress it forward, the two central defensive midfielders provide great outlets và are able to lớn smoothly connect defense with attack. When in possession, the 5 midfielders are also able khổng lồ spread wide, create midfield overloads, và dominate the ball using intricate passing triangles.

But don"t think that 4-2-3-1 is all about contentedly sitting in, passing the ball around the midfield và defensive areas, and waiting patiently for a moment khổng lồ pounce. It can also be a highly aggressive formation. Having 2 central defensive midfielders always providing cover allows the 3 more advanced midfielders lớn press high và essentially become forwards themselves, creating a front 4 capable of causing chaos in opposition defenses.

Chances are created by pressing the ball high, winning possession, và interlinking as a fluid front 4. Sounds good, right? When implemented properly, 4-2-3-1 can be incredibly difficult to stop. However, there are some weaknesses that come with this shape. Let"s look into them.

What are the weaknesses of a 4-2-3-1 formation?

Like most advanced formations, the 4-2-3-1 requires constant communication and a lot of hard work. In order khổng lồ stay compact và organized, each section of the formation needs to be instructing & advising each other at all times. This is particularly crucial for the 2 central defensive midfielders (or CDMs), who must remain disciplined và defensively-minded, while at the same time always giving passing options khổng lồ whoever is on the ball.

It"s also possible that some central defensive midfielders are more effective sitting in & performing the "destroyer" role on their own; think of Chelsea"s Claude Makelele, or Manchester City"s Fernandinho, for example. It could be that your central midfield area becomes a little congested or tight using the 4-2-3-1. However, this doesn"t have lớn be the case, & if strong communication is maintained throughout matches, it"s unlikely that this will be a major problem.

Another thing worth mentioning is the wide midfield areas. If your two wider midfielders aren"t fast và dominant in one-on-one situations, they can tend khổng lồ become weak links. Not only bởi they need lớn be able to link up with the striker khổng lồ create chances, they also need to lớn be able to lớn press the ball hard, limiting the options of opposition defenders & tracking back if the ball does get past them. There"s also lots of creative responsibility placed on the CAM (central attacking midfielder), who will often be a team"s star player (think of Mezut Ozil, David Silva, or Thomas Muller).

It"s easy khổng lồ see why 4-2-3-1 replaced 4-4-2 as Europe"s dominant formation in the late 2000s — it"s essentially because its weaknesses are far less impactful. Playing 2 strikers can create all sorts of risks that are negated by the 4-2-3-1 system, with its advanced midfield 3 being able to lead attacks while simultaneously dominating central possession. So who has benefited from this important soccer development? It"s time khổng lồ explore the most famous clubs & managers to lớn have used the 4-2-3-1 system.

Which clubs & managers use the 4-2-3-1 system?

The 2010 World Cup highlighted the dominance of the 4-2-3-1 system, with all four semi-finalists using a double pivot, & Spain, Germany, & the Netherlands lining up as a 4-2-3-1 (while Uruguay went for more of a 4-4-2 with 2 deep-lying center-mids). Vincent Del Bosque"s World Cup-winning Spain team were arguably the most important pioneers of the 4-2-3-1 system, with the double pivot of Sergio Busquets và Xabi Alonso proving lớn be one of world football"s best CDM partnerships.

Other successful implementations of the 4-2-3-1 include Bayern Munich, who have used this system lớn totally dominate the Bundesliga throughout the past decade. Coaches such as Hansi Flick and Julian Naglesmann have adapted the shape in different ways, but the German champions" success has rested on the basic foundations of the 4-2-3-1 structure.


How should you play against a 4-2-3-1?

It"s often the case that the best way to play against a certain formation is to lớn simply line up with the same shape yourself. This is definitely true when it comes to lớn the 4-2-3-1, because it will allow you lớn place players in areas of the pitch that are vulnerable khổng lồ overloads when lining up against a well-drilled 4-2-3-1 side. However, there are other approaches you can take, too.

Using a midfield đá quí can be a good way to lớn nullify a 4-2-3-1 structure, as shown by Italy in the triệu euro 2012 semi-final which saw them beat Germany 2-1. A midfield đá quí shape allows teams to dominate central areas & suffocate opposition midfielders by getting tight và letting full-backs provide width. It"s also possible khổng lồ beat a 4-2-3-1 shape using a 4-3-3, which can utilize a tight midfield 3 while allowing wingers lớn terrorize opposition defenders alongside their central striker.

If you want khổng lồ find out more about the benefits & weaknesses of different soccer shapes, you should kiểm tra out our article on 9 of the best soccer formations explained. Getting khổng lồ grips with the pros and cons of each structure is crucial if you want khổng lồ develop your tactical knowledge and learn more about coaching within the game. Và if you want a bit of light relief from what can sometimes be quite a complex area of soccer knowledge, take a look at our guide lớn the 10 best panenka penalties ever.

Xem thêm: Các Công Thức Tính Khoảng Cách Trong Không Gian Oxyz, Công Thức Toạ Độ Trong Không Gian

Fred Garratt-Stanley is a freelance writer & long-suffering Norwich City fan hâm mộ with experience reporting on football for a number of titles. He also has a background in music & culture journalism, with bylines in NME, The Quietus, Resident Advisor và more. Currently, he"s working as a content writer for a variety of online health và fitness publications.